spacer.png, 0 kB
HOME
MANGALAWIKI
FORUM
KSR Down Under, Part III PDF Print E-mail
Written by Kimon   
Friday, 17 September 2010 20:21

Aussiecon4 has ended, but articles, reviews and feedback is still coming in!

The Australian Literature Review is doing a whole series of articles dedicated to the event, and on Kim Stanley Robinson's panels specifically.

There's a report on Stan's Guest of Honour speech, for which there's additional reporting here.

"We're heading for a utopian future. And I say that because it's either utopia or a really severe catastrophe."

There's a report of Stan and Bob (that's Robert Silverberg) chatting on everything from New Wave SF, the process of writing (sitting or nude?) and archaeology to envrionmentalism, technology and the role of government. Additional reporting from Aussie blogs here.

Both started out writing on a typewriter and have known the frustration of typing and retyping pages because they couldn’t delete with their typewriter. Stan recalled about his first experience with a computer, “I remember pressing the backspace for the first time and the letter went away. I said, “I want one of these.””

Stan suggested that people’s lives in all societies are calibrated by the laws of that society and that governments have a role in continually re-calibrating those laws to meet the needs of people’s circumstances. However, Bob suggested that societies have worked best when people have freedom to pursue happiness. Stan suggested that governments have a role in distributing resources appropriately. Bob suggested that the appropriate role of government is to ensure people have the freedom to accumulate resources to direct as they choose toward the pursuit of happiness. It was refreshing to see this kind of conversation in Australia, in which two people with fundamentally different ideas on the most appropriate way for people to govern not only discussed it civilly but also discussed it in good humour as good friends.

Bob: “You’re something of an environmentalist.” (Eliciting a chuckle from the audience.)
Stan: “Except when I am flying to the other side of the world for parties.”

There's a report on the panel "Write What You Know!" with Jack Dann, Chris Lawson, Kim Stanley Robinson, Kaaron Warren, with advice for writers and the role of personal experience and research in a novel. Additional reporting and signing picture here!

Kim Stanley Robinson (K.S.R.) gave the following example: On a 2 month trip he spent in Antarctica, he stayed at a base where there were around 10 times more men than women, and the women had used the saying, “The odds are good but the goods are odd.” On that trip, he also observed how pine needles sank individually into the snow instead of a bunch of pine needles melting a patch of snow around the whole bunch. By getting some first-hand experience in an area you intend to write about in your fiction, you can pick up all sorts of details and this knowledge can add up and contribute to a much more realistic and detailed depiction.

Overall, the mantra ‘write what you know’ probably does more harm than good. Kim Stanley Robinson even went as far as stating that it came from people like Hemmingway and Kerouac who had no imagination therefore they felt they needed to have experienced everything themselves (his words, not mine). Everyone, barring aliens who read this blog, is human, everyone knows human emotions. A story, a book, a trilogy is made up primarily of human emotions. This is what we know, and this is the main area in which a writer can stuff up. The facts you can find out.

(Photo by Zachary Kendal; l-r: Tom Moylan (m), Jonathan Cowie, John Clute, Glenda Larkin, Kim Stanley Robinson)

And there's another report on the panel "Destroying the future to save the planet: the environmental politics of SF/F" with the likes of Tom Moylan, Kim Stanley Robinson, John Clute, Glenda Larke, Jonathan Cowie (also check the comments on that link). From Lord Byron's Darkness and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein to John Brunner's Stand on Zanzibar Stan's own Science In The Capital trilogy, the relation of contemporary science with literature was discussed. Additional reporting here.

K.S.R. said he likes to look at the effects rather than the causes of the destruction in stories of this kind. He also said he prefers to provide practical and pragmatic portrayals of the effects of a situation – for example, if portraying a fictional situation in which use of resources is rationed out then also portraying the limitations on personal freedoms which go along with that.

John Clute describes climate change: “a global tragedy we don’t even seem to have the words to describe”

There's an exclusive interview with Stan, where he talks about his writing, his readings, his childhood and also teases his next novel:

I am about a third of the way through a novel, and will be writing it through the fall and winter, with the plan of finishing it in the spring. It’s a science fiction novel set in our solar system, all over our solar system, in the year 2312. By then people will be terraforming many planetary bodies, including Earth itself; but I hope to keep a realistic feel to the whole thing, to describe what we really could do, rather than shoot off into any kind of fantasy scenario. I’ll be pushing the boundaries of science fiction realism.

And there's more! Stan's talk on "Climate Change and Utopia" was captured on audio (direct mp3 link, courtesy of Gary Kemble) and, at least partly, on video:

Also, there's a report on the panel "The bioethics of terraforming" (basically, a panel on Mars) with Kim Stanley Robinson, James Benford, Sam Scheiner, David D. Levine.

The main question is: why would we want to go?

We could be doing it as an insurance policy. Kim Stanley Robinson said that this notion is both simplistic and naïve. Mars is not easy. Mars is cold and inhospitable. It is dusty. Dust gets into everything. It has less energy than Earth. While 15% less sunlight might not be detectable with the human eye, generating energy through solar power will require more effort. Terraforming is largely in the realm of Science Fiction, and the question is if we should attempt it in the first place. Is it ethical to modify an environment that may harbour information vital to understanding our origins?

Stan also presented this year's Hugo Award for Best Novel: a tie (!) between China Miéville's The City & the City and Paolo Bacigalupi's The Windup Girl. The Hugos have uploaded the whole ceremony on video (ack! the announcement of that award's win was not recorded!).

All in all it seemed it was great fun! And my thanks to Google alerts for helping me compile this post!

More is on the way...

(Top photo by Cory Doctorow)

Comments
Add New Search
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:D:):(:0:shock::confused:8):lol::x:P:oops::cry:
:evil::twisted::roll::wink::!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Last Updated on Friday, 17 September 2010 22:42
 
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB